 |
|
 |

James C. Harrington, attorney with the Texas Civil
Rights Project, Lindsey Bishop and Carolyn Clark in front of the Federal
Courthouse in San Antonio on September 14, 2009. The lesbian couple filed
a federal suit after a police raid on their home for a non-existent drug
lab ended with the two women being handcuffed for two hours while they
were harrassed by police on the scene. (Photo by Antonia Padilla)
Report cites SAPD mistreatment of
women, minorities, gays
QSanAntonio.com, August 26, 2011
A report released on August 25 by the Texas Civil Rights Project titled,
"Police Misconduct in San Antonio," describes a police culture
where "SAPD officers are quick to protect each other, but are not
as responsive to the needs of community members, particularly when those
members come from poor, vulnerable, and marginalized populations."
"A string of incidents in the past few years has revealed a troubling
pattern of misconduct by San Antonio police officers, ranging from illegal
searches and sexual misconduct to unresponsiveness and indifference to
victims. The thread connecting these incidents is the fact that better
supervision, accountability, and transparency by SAPD could have prevented
them." reads the first paragraph of the report.
The report goes on to document incidents of sexual misconduct by individual
policemen and a failure of officers to respond to situations with unwarranted
aggression and apathy toward victims of rape and domestic violence.
In the past few years, individual officers have been caught sexually harassing
women, having sex with arrested individuals and in the case of one cop,
showing up at the home of a victim in hopes of getting a date with her.
One policeman used to go "offline" during his work day to have
sex with his girlfriend in his police cruiser, while his buddies in the
department covered for him. Another raped a transgender woman while she
was handcuffed.
In discussing a situation where police interacted with two lesbians the
report describes a harrowing situation:
"Aggressive tactics can also combine with personal biases to
unnecessarily escalate a situation. On April 28, 2009, a group of nine
San Antonio police officers conducted a raid at the Leon Valley home of
a lesbian couple. Without knocking, the officers broke down the couple’s
door with guns drawn, accompanied by drug-sniffing dogs. The officers
were searching for a man named Randy and evidence of a methamphetamine
lab. Their search and questioning failed to turn up any evidence of “Randy”
or of any narcotics, and it quickly became apparent that they had gone
to the wrong place or the informant’s information was wrong or conjured
up. Instead of releasing the two women, however, the officers chose to
keep them handcuffed and spent two hours harassing and humiliating them.
They were never read their Miranda rights." (Click
here for related story.)
In this case, the Texas Civil Rights Project filed a federal suit against
the SAPD. However, the suit was dismissed on the grounds that the officer's
had executed the search warrant in "good faith" and that their
conduct was not constitutionally egregious. An appeal is pending.
In analyzing the SAPD's problems, the report states that the organization
"suffers from a systemic lack of supervision and accountability that
allows serious incidents of misconduct to arise." The result is that
cops on the beat know they won't be watched closely and develop renegade
behaviors for which they are seldom punished.
The TCRP also found that the when a victim files a complaint, individuals
in the SAPD's Internal Affairs Department often try to protect fellow
officers and "disbelieve and attack the credibility of complainants."
Most telling is the fact that victims of police abuse rarely receive any
follow-up on the status or outcome of their Internal Affairs complaints.
The report also states, " . . . by all appearances, a complaint filed
with Internal Affairs is more likely to trigger an investigation of the
complainant than of the officer complained against. It is therefore not
surprising that citizens are generally hesitant to file a complaint."
Despite all of the negative situations described in the report, the TCRP
acknowledges that the SAPD has shown improvement since the arrival of
Chief William McManus in 2006, saying he "has made some efforts to
move the department in the right direction by listening to citizens’
concerns and pushing for changes."
One of those improvements is on the Chief’s Advisory Action Board
which sits in on Internal Affairs hearings. The Board added more civilian
members so that it is now composed of seven officers and seven civilians,
and removed the police union's ability to veto appointment of new Board
members.
The TCRP makes a series of recommendations that could help improve the
public's relationship with the SAPD. These include a establishing a civilian
oversight board, having the District Attorney prioritize pursuing cases
of police misconduct, maintaining a more fair and transparent Internal
Affairs process and insisting officers report misconduct by fellow officers.
In terms of dealing with the GLBT community, the reports suggests that
sensitivity training should be given not only to Police Academy cadets
but also to veteran officers.
The TCRP's stated goal is to "promote racial, social, and economic
justice through education and litigation. TCRP strives to foster equality,
secure justice, ensure diversity, and strengthen communities."
Click
here to get a copy of the report.
|
 |